For those who don’t know; the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was created to pro-mote, the objectives of the NORTH AMERICAN UNION (NAU).

Currently, the Mexican economy is ruled by NAFTA and, the Mexican people are searching for jobs outside of their country, just like what is happening in the European Union (EU).

A Mexican immigrant from Cancun, said to a prominent newspaper; "If it were true that NAFTA was good for Mexico, we wouldn't be here (USA)."

On September 14, 1993, President Bill Clinton signed an agreement for a proposal called the North American Free Trade Agreement. His promise to the American people was; “NAFTA would create more jobs in the UNITED STATES”, but in actuality; by 2006, the NAFTA policy cost the United States over a million jobs.

The Wonderful World of NAFTA (Part 1/2)


EMPERORS' CREEDO: HST/ GST

Legislation to merge Ontario's eight per cent sales tax with the five per cent Grab we must . Spend we must . Tax we must…who collects and divides it???

Harm we must . Scam we must . Tax we must., will create jobs, not kill them; McGuinty says… Dalton McGuinty says; the New Democrats are stuck in the past and, view all corporations as evil (but ONTARIO is a CORPORATION)!

www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html

Click on the link above for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission SEC, then enter ONTARIO in the search box, where it says; enter company name, then click on “find companies.”

Look at the third from the bottom - ONTARIO PROVINCE OF
SIC: 8888 - FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS.

Then click on the four eights, and when the page changes, look toward the bottom and see all those registered CORPORATE PROVINCES.

Click on the red number for ONTARIO 0000074615

You will then go to another page, which displays the business address for ONTARIO to the right top of the page. There is even a telephone number there; 416 325 8053 and, if you were to dial that number, IRENE STITCH will answer. But she won’t identify where she is from, she’ll just say her name.

If you say; pardon me, I thought I called the GOVERNMENT of ONTARIO, she’ll say yes; it’s the FINANCE DEPARTMENT???

GOVERNMENT study shows; moving to a single sales tax will create 600,000 jobs over ten years (sounds familiar; as that of another CORPORATION'S PRESIDENT: BILL CLINTON)?

There will be a series of cuts to income and corporate taxes, (but they'll get it back, through the "backdoor," folks) and up to $1,000 in rebates for families, to help offset the impact of the harmonized sales tax…in the first year.

The National Citizens Coalition estimates the HST will cost the average taxpayer an additional $800 to $1,000 annually (you'll ride for free the first year...then you'll have to realize, who's strange hand is in your pocket again).

Highway 407, of ONTARIO, CANADA is owned by a construction company called CINTRA, of MADRID; and that’s SPAIN…SECURITY & PROSPERITY PARTNERSHIP (SPP).

Oh! In case you were wondering, you can also do the same search on the SEC regards CANADA

“Christianity stands or falls with its revolutionary protest against violence, arbitrariness, and pride of power, and with its plea for the weak. Christians are doing too little, to make these points clear, rather than too much. Christendom adjusts itself far too easily, to the worship of power. Christians should give more offense, shock the world far more, than they are doing now. Christians should take a stronger stand, in favor of the weak, rather than considering first, the possible right of the strong.” - Dietrich Bonhoeffer.

Information compiled and provided by: Christopher-Peter: Maingot; without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

Ok so CAP does not like NAFTA. I think it would be pretty easy to show what the claims were and what the results were. I mean it has been a while and like AGW Alarmists old claims can expose the current fraud.

The argument presented against NAFTA is from a USA point of view. One of the goals of CAP is sovereignty. That goal is undermined when American facts, arguments and view points are presented as somehow equally relevant to Canadians.

First and Second Generation Canadians are particularly confused by this blending of view points and often confuse Canadian and American interests.
A good example of this would be the US federal elections or politics in general.

Many Canadians identify or just like American politicians. Which is fine but they often want them elected or not elected even when is not in Canada’s, best interest. The recent election of a President with very anti-Canadian supporters is just one example.

Not that CAP or we should have any opinion or position on who Americans elect. We as Canadians should no more have an opinion or say in such things as Americans should have in our elections. That goes back to CAPs sovereignty position.

So while the video is nice, it is American and as such Canadians should have no official position on it, though we should have opinions about trade agreements in general.

Speaking of trade agreements. What is CAPs, or your, position on Trade Agreements?

IMO It is all fine and dandy to be against something but it is important for consistency and clarity to also be for something. For political parties the positive should be the base from which points are made.

Of course a country does not need to have trade agreements, North Korea seems to not be particularly interested in them, but no party is going to be taken serious if they are planning to drive the country into the socialist hell many trade agreement free counties are.

So why risk economic collapse by cancelling agreements? Why not negotiate improvements, put in place systems that ensure Canada will always negotiate for Canada? Seems that would meet the same end and be sellable.


On the HST and taxes.

CAP is trying to be a Canadian party but I like the idea that each member pitches his view point from his region or province. That I think is very sustainable.

But from a CAP point of view taxes cannot be bad. Taxes are the price of admission to a civilized society. The question is how those taxes are to be raised.

I would suggest that those decisions be made on a region by region or province by province basis.

That of course, like trade, would not preclude having a general position on how the provinces or federal government should raise taxes.

Personally I do not want the federal government to be able to tax Canadians except through the provinces. Ottawa is funded by the provinces and when they go around the province to tax people they are not only adding in yet another layer of bureaucracy but due to the configuration of the current system undermining democracy and reducing a person’s say in how their tax money is spent.

So how should Ontario get the money they need to run their government, ensure their sovereignty and deliver services?

I would agree that services should not be contracted out except on a very limited basis. Again it adds another level of bureaucracy, cost and as it is currently being used reduces accountability.

But back to taxes, how are they to be raised?