They may not be any good, at protecting us from dangerous drug products, and criminal corporations, but the FDA is sure good at protecting us from cures.

With the help of the American Medical Association, and the news media, the FDA has done a masterful job of tracking down physicians, with successful cancer treatments, harassing them, and driving them out of practice.

Cancer is a dream come true, for those with an organized crime mentality - pharmaceutical companies, medical groups, government pschyo-crats - who see nothing wrong with using fear and ignorance, as a tool to extract limitless amounts of money from vulnerable, trusting people.

This Italian made film, tells the story of cancer cures that have been scientifically and clinically proven, that have been driven off the market.

Why?

Is it because they kill like radiation and chemotherapy?

No. Because they work, are inexpensive, and safe.

Information like this not only kills the cash cow, it also vaporizes the power of the so-called elite which is why its brutally suppressed every time it rears its head.

Visit: Brasscheck TV


Additional Information...


The Chemotherapy Mafia--What We Now Know.

Week of 8/8/06

On July 20, 1995, the Washington State Medical Quality Assurance
Commission raided the office of Glenn Warner, MD, an oncologist with
unusual views on healing, and revoked his medical license. Allegedly,
Warner had cured more than 1,000 patients from terminal cancer—not with
chemotherapy and radiation but with diet and exercise regimens, certain
immunotherapeutic drugs, and other holistic methods. When he appealed
his case in court, the commission’s attorney, Beverly Goetz, argued that
cancer patients were “incapable” and “unqualified” to decide whether
they received quality care or not. Only experts—like the members of said
commission—were capable of making that judgment call, she said.

Unfortunately, this standpoint seems to prevail in the United States
these days. Self-determination takes a backseat in favor of
state-mandated “health care.” A fact that becomes eerily obvious in
cancer cases where minors are involved.

But first, we should ask how valuable chemotherapy really is. There is
no doubt that cancer is big business in the U.S. While in 1990, $3.53
billion was spent on chemotherapy, the number more than doubled to $7.51
billion only four years later. By 2009, so the latest projections,
cancer therapy products and services will rake in over $27 billion.

Read more: mailman2.u.washington.edu/pipermail/phnu...6-August/017945.html

I have heard of the FDA covering up cures many a times. In fact A Canadian fellow out East by the name of Rick Simpson found a cure for cancer using marijuana (THC) extract. Health Canada turned down all his findings

I really suggest Canadians watch Rick Simpson's documentary on his findings called "Run From the Cure".

You can find the video here.

Yeah...that sums it up...'run from the cure'.

I think we'll be running for a long time to come however...perhaps this may actually have some benefit, in other respects, but not to finding a cure for Cancer, I'm afraid.

The sad part to this 'RUNNING' concept, however, is; no one ever seems to, or has honestly supported, the concept of running for the CAUSE???

There's a host of those, which can easily be eliminated from our lives, and or, environment.

Additional information...

Paradox Of Searching For A Cancer Cure - Why Eat Organic?

Link does not work

This is an important point that Christopher has raised in his excellent post.

I was speaking with a new CAP member today who commented on the incredibly huge amount of wealth that Canadians produce each year through their work, creativity, and services, including parenting and other unpaid work. Billions and billions of dollars, taken from that wealth of ours, is spent on Chemotherapy, other dubious drugs and drug research, paying for expensive luxuries for putting on a fancy party for "the important people of the world" and police to deprive us of our basic civil liberties (as witnessed at the G20 event in Toronto), and many other things that do not improve the quality of life for Canadians.

Yet many Canadians, in various communities, regions, cultures, and circumstances, do not have access to enough resources for even the basic necessities for a decent and healthy life. Somehow, in spite of all the wealth we create, there doesn't seem to be "enough to go around" when it comes to many of our citizens, but there's plenty to spend on hosting the world's "elite" leaders and suppressing Canadians' voices of concern or protest, or subsidising powerful drug companies and buying their products when we don't even need or want them, like the excess H1N1 vaccine that had to be thrown out, and may have done more harm than good for those who received it. What is wrong with this picture?

No one asks us how we want the wealth used, when they skim it so deeply from our lives, and no one reports to us exactly where it all goes. We hear the vague mention of billions for this and billions for that, but some of us are homeless and have no clean drinking water or adequate shelter or access to land or food or other natural resources they could use to create rich and satisfying lives for themselves and their families, and contribute to their community's richness. Millions are unemployed or work so many hours per week at minimum wage that they have little energy or ability to do much else, but they can't afford adequate food and shelter for themselves and their families. It just doesn't make any sense and it isn't fair. The huge international corporations own almost everything, and they do what they want and often leave a toxic mess behind that we then have to pay to clean up. Things don't have to be like this.

The member I spoke with sincerely believes that there actually is plenty to go around. He thinks that the wealth we create, and the resources that are integral to the land we live in, are more than enough for all of us to live well, in all of our diverse regions, communities, cultures, and circumstances. I agree with him, and I believe that Canadians create plenty of wealth to take good care of everyone here. We should use it to provide all of us with the education and other opportunities that each needs, whatever their circumstances, to live a productive and satisfying life that enriches their personal lives, their community and, thereby, this nation. We just need to learn to work together cooperatively and elect only accountable representatives to Parliament, who know that we know, that they have to listen to us and allow us to control our own resources, the wealth we create, and the decisions that affect our lives and our communities. It's as simple and as profound as setting up an electoral system in each Riding, where voters register and then place and change their votes whenever they see fit. For more information, please contact me:

Doris Foster
CAP Membership Coordinator
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Thank you for caring enough about Canada to visit our site!

I have discovered and fixed, the problem--I took it for granted, that the available option (insert link icon) via the forum's menu, would take all of the characters contained in the web-address or 'URL'...for some reason...it does not accept all of the characters, so I had to insert the url-link-address manually.

If you encounter connection problems again, you can always do a search on the title too...next resort.

Thanks for your noticing of the problem.

I suppose if there was transparency in the distribution of the countries wealth, something which a true democracy would do undoubtedly, those living in Ontario and BC wouldn't be getting slapped with a harmonized sales tax. Yet another scheme by the government in power to tell us how much money they are putting into this social fund or this school yet the tax payer sees little if any results.

TRANSPARENCY! TRANSPARENCY! TRANSPARENCY!

Thanks for your acknowledgment Doris, and, for your points of view, viz; "the important people of the world...depriving us of our basic civil liberties".

I have often wondered; when, and why, did we just simply give up, and allow these self proclaimed ‘elitist’, to take total control of the natural resources of a land, e.g., the landmass known as Canada, and not (CANADA).

There is more than enough, yes, natural wealth here in Canada, that could be shared by every one. However…it was usurped...taken...possessed by the CROWN, aka., the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF [CANADA].

“No one reports to us…where does it all go? We hear vague mentions of billions for this, and billions for that, but some of us are homeless and have no clean drinking water, or adequate shelter, or access to land or food, or other natural resources - Doris”.

You may not know it my friend, but it is estimated that we spend $500,000 dollars to kill each enemy soldier, while we spend only $53.00 dollars for each person classified as poor. And, most of that $53.00 dollars goes to salaries for people who are not poor - Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Excerpt of a Sermon at the Ebenezer Baptist Church on April 30, 1967.

This to me, is the best summation of the current situation, called life, as 'they' would have us know it.

Right, I agree with Christopher, and what he has quoted from King is another arrow pointing in the same direction...the "$500,000" worth of wealth spent to kill someone labelled "enemy" {and by whom is the decision made about who is an enemy?} is created {read "paid for"} by whom? ...and by whom is the decision made to spend it? ...and who receives the money that is spent? Vast majority of it probably ends up in the hands of arms and related manufacturers, as profit to the stockholders, and how many of those are, or are working openly or secretly with, the ones who are making the decisions about who the enemy is and where that $500,000 gets spent?

But the creation of the wealth, ultimately, to pay off the debts incurred in our name, whether it's money spent on arms to kill supposed enemies and the "collateral damage" that inevitably occurs, or on research that ultimately poisons us and profits the mega drug companies, or on tools for surveillance to make sure no one is going to "out" their very profitable scam they are pulling on us, or even on another election in the perpetual soap opera of "which dictator would you like to have starring in your national entertainment drama?"...ultimately it's the rest of us, the ones who aren't making any of those decisions, who actually do the work to pay the debt.

Do we accept it or are we willing to do the work to change it? That seems to be the question, unless someone has other alternatives?

I just seems to me, in the long run, it would be a lot less work to change it, by demanding and creating an electoral process that allows us to change our votes so we can be sure we are electing accountable representatives, instead of ones that will just vote {on our behalf, and it's our wealth they get paid with, too, remember} however their party's dictator tells them to vote, on all of those decisions I mentioned above.

Do we want to take the responsibility for making the decisions about how the wealth we create is spent or not? Do we want self-determination, and the responsibility for organising ourselves and deciding together what works for our communities and our nation or do we want to be told how it's going to be, and we just have to accept having all of these decisions made for us by the same people who are profiting from the decisions they are making and which we not only have to comply with, but must pay for through our work, and our children will have to continue where we left off?

I honestly don't blame people who feel overwhelmed at the idea of having to re-think things like how to organise our society and what seems like a pretty big change, from a term democracy to one that allows votes to be changed and representatives to be changed according to the actual support they are given, whenever enough people really want a change, but I have to say to them, "Look what a term democracy has given us, here and all over the world, for hundreds of years? Does what we have look like self-governance or not?"

So really, the question is, "Do we want self-governance and are we willing to do the work of making it happen?"

As usual, for more information about possibilities we're exploring at CAP:

Doris Foster
CAP Membership Coordinator
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

I think the Dr.King quotation would be a really good selling point to the general public when it comes to the current war in Afghanistan. I won't turn this topic off-topic, but I believe it could "win" us votes and I thought it deserved mentioning.