The following two photographs included with this message will show the distinct difference between a 'Chem-Trail' (photo 2159)
and, a 'Con-Trail' (photo 2164)
Both of these pictures were taken on the same day and, from the same location. The date was Sunday, September 20, 2009 and the location was from the kitchen window of our home in Ontario, Canada. Photo 2159 was taken at approximately 09:30 and photo 2164 approximately two hours later (11:30).
The view from the window, looks toward the Northwest, and therefore, the aircraft which created these trails, were originating somewhere from the Southeast.
It later became more obvious, during a short drive to another destination in the city, as to where these trails were originating. They were all coming from the same place, and heading in the same direction and, in an isolated area of the sky. Mostly South and East of our location…somewhere over the continental UNITED STATES.
I imagine that many of us, who live on the geographic landmass known as Canada, would have already noticed the un-seasonably cooler temperatures, especially in the morning periods. At the time of taking photo 2159 (09:30), the temperature was, quite cool, and a light jacket would have provided more comfort while outdoors. There was very little humidity at this time of day and, temperature. And, no visible signs of "condensation nuclei" (salt from evaporating sea spray, dust, smog or industrial pollution, and smoke particles) that which is typically needed, for water vapour to adhere to, or collect upon, so that clouds may form.
It is obvious from photo 2159, that the sky is clear and blue...no cloud formations other than the trails, which resemble Cirrus type clouds. These clouds typically require humidity levels of at least 70% to take shape.
In photo 2164; approximate time (11:30) on the same day, you will notice that there are more cloud type formations and, the temperature had not risen much in the two hours.
What in fact had taken place was; the "trails" we observed, being left in that particular part of the sky, had drifted due to the wind direction, and toward the Northwest. It was within that two-hour time frame, that the trails had created its own cloud formations.
The reasons for photo 2164 being larger, and or of different contrast, was due to the late realization of the aircraft going by, and the need to zoom to the maximum optical range of the camera (4x). Due to the distance it had traveled relative of the window frame, the size of the aircraft, and to capture the image before it disappeared behind the tree, I had to use maximum optical zoom.
The obvious other differences between the two photos are: Chem-Trail vs. Con-Trail.
Chem-Trail is the typical abbreviated word for "chemical trail" and Con-Trail, being "condensation trail."
The term Chem-Trail has been on the mainstream media news for some time now, albeit on a limited basis, and always passed off as a hoax or “conspiracy theory.”
If one were to do an Internet search on these two terms; Con/Chem trails, you will see the first, or most popular hit, being that coming from Wikipedia.
You will notice that all the pictures (except B-17 B&W) are photos of “non-typical condensation trails” and more in keeping with the now controversial “chemical trails.”
From the wikipedia site page regarding "contrail," you will notice the "See also" row, toward the bottom of the page. You will also notice this bullet point: "Chemtrail conspiracy theory."
If you follow that wikipedia link (hole), you will then be forwarded to opinions coming from three of the most believed voices of reason on this planet.
"The UNITED STATES AIR FORCE has stated; that the theory is a hoax, which "has been investigated and refuted by many established and accredited universities, scientific organizations, and major media publications".
"The BRITISH DEPARTMENT for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated; that chemtrails "are not scientifically recognized phenomena".
"The CANADIAN GOVERNMENT House Leader has stated; that "The term 'chemtrails' is a popularized expression, and there is no scientific evidence to support their existence." Above three paragraphs are excerpts from Wikipedia
I will agree with anyone who believes these chem-trails to be conspiratorial in nature. But I definitely will not accept them as theories.
Thanks to "You Tube," I was able to include some short videos here. I hope they may help to further inform you on this subject, or issue. The longest of these presentations is just over six minutes.
Contrail vs. Chemtrail 101.
Chemtrail Proof - German Military Exposed.
The Ultimate Proof of Chemtrails.
The Facts: Contrails vs Chemtrails.
I can personally relate to the last video presentation, in the sense that it only serves to satisfy my concerns.
This is perhaps owing to the fact that I have been a licensed (U.S. and CANADA) aviation pilot for more than 25 years.
If anyone knows anything about the study of aviation and its related subjects, they will concur; it does involve the study of meteorology (condensation, humidity, temperature, condensation nuclei, and clouds) and the theory of flight (aerodynamics-contrails) etc, etc, etc.
Mainstream science accepts that trails from jet aircraft are lingering for hours, but claims it is a natural phenomenon--Scientists now admit that emissions from aircraft are forming artificial clouds that block out the sun, precisely what geoengineering advocates like top eugenicist and White House science advisor John P. Holdren have called for, but the article tries to insinuate that the effect is caused by natural “vapours,” when in reality it can be attributed to chemtrails that contain substances harmful to humans.
I do believe that there is a consensus among people and government (notice how I divided the two species) that chemtrails are a real project happening daily on a global scale. I think the real argument lies in...Why?
The most common answer I hear from government is to reverse global warming, but to buy into that reasoning you must believe global warming is what "scientists" and "government" say it is.
What we also know from tests is that a high amount of aluminum & barium have been found shortly after these aircraft have left their marks.
So, where do we go from here?
Those who would sacrifice freedoms in the name of safety deserve neither
Last Edit: 1 year, 10 months ago by TheInfoWarrior.
Shasta County Chemtrail/Geo-Engineering Contamination Cover-Up
Numerous residents from Shasta County have reported multiple tests to the Shasta County Air Quality District that reveal a mass contamination of both aluminum and barium. Aluminum in free form is very toxic to eco-systems and human health. Residents of the county believe that the source of contamination is from geo-engineering/chemtrail programs that allegedly have been deployed on a mass scale during the past few years. Despite many attempts from concerned residents to get the office to look into this, no action has been taken to date to address this issue.
Watch as Michael J. Murphy and Paul Wittenberger confront Shasta County Air Quality District's Ross Bell on hidden camera about his alleged involvement with the cover-up. After watching, you will find that he has no intentions of addressing this important issue.
Please take a moment to e-mail and call Ross Bell to educate him on the dangers of geo-engineering programs and also to let him know that we will not tolerate a cover-up that is so harmful to eco-systems and human health.
Ross Bell's contact info
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Shasta County Chemtrail/Geo-Engineering Contamination Cover-Up